Posts

Notes for 5/1/2026

 5/1/2026 What are you looking forward to in the near future?   Do we deserve credit for doing what’s right? The default answer depends on meaning of “right.” Actions can be: -    Obligatory -    Forbidden -    Permissible Suppose you don’t cheat on your spouse. Most people would agree that you don’t deserve credit for this. Fidelity is part of the marriage commitment and is therefore obligatory. Suppose you don’t murder your business partner. Most people would agree that you don’t deserve credit for this, either. Murder is ethically forbidden (not murdering is obligatory). These examples suggest the general principle that: (C) Someone only deserves credit for actions that are not obligatory. This agrees with common intuitions about numerous examples. Suppose I give $20 to a charity. I deserve credit for this because my action is permissible but not obligatory. Saul Smilansky argues that I should generally be grateful when people don’t harm me. This me...

Notes for 4/27/2026

Image
   4/27/2026   Would you rather understand a few things perfectly or many things imperfectly?   A “sorites paradox” is a paradox of vagueness.   Suppose you pour a container of salt on the table to form a heap of salt.   Rule1: If you remove 1 grain of salt, you will still have a heap.   We know that if we remove enough grains of salt,   Rule1 will fail (certainly when there are zero grains left).   Now start putting grains of salt back on the table.   Rule2: If you add 1 grain of salt, you won’t have a heap.   We know that if we add enough grains of salt, Rule2 will fail (certainly when the whole container has been added back).   The question is what “enough” means in both Rule1 and Rule2.   There are different basic theories of vagueness.   Metaphysical Vagueness: The world has vague objects and vague boundaries.     This model of a hydro...

Notes for 4/24/2026

 4/24/2026 [Philosophy Club every Monday, 4-5 pm, in the Buchtel College of Arts and Sciences room 436 ("The Cave")] [Bioethics Club: Mondays from 5:30pm-6:30pm in Leigh Hall 408] I am sure that I would never ___.   Week 14 response Ask me any philosophical question   A possible answer to “What, exactly, is art?” Art is a form of play in which something that is created or constructed is presented for the primary purpose of appealing to an audience’s interest. The disadvantage of this is that many will think it too broad (it will allow works of fiction, movies, tv shows, games, etc. to count as art forms).  But this could also be considered an advantage. The emphases on “primary purpose” and “audience interest” rules out a lot of commercial art, sports, club dancing (though if oneself can be the audience this might be different). Another interesting question about art is whether qualitative judgments can ever be true or false. The sayings:  “Beauty is in the eye of the beh...

Notes for 4/22/2026

Image
   4/22/2026 [Philosophy Club every Monday, 4-5 pm, in the Buchtel College of Arts and Sciences room 436 ("The Cave")] [Bioethics Club: Mondays from 5:30pm-6:30pm in Leigh Hall 408]   What is your most useless talent?     What, exactly, is art ?   As with many concepts, dictionary definitions are inadequate. (Example: “the conscious use of skill and creative imagination especially in the production of aesthetic objects” – Merriam-Webster)     Some forms of art do seem to involve skill or technique.   (La Pieta by Michelangelo) (Great wave off Kanagawa by Hokusai) Other works of art emphasize ‘creative imagination’:   (Les Voyageurs by Bruno Catalano)   (Spoonbridge and Cherry by Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen) But then there are pieces of art that don’t seem to require either skill or creative imagination (though the crucial question is what, exactly, is mean...

Notes for 4/20/2026

4/20/2026 [Philosophy Club every Monday, 4-5 pm, in the Buchtel College of Arts and Sciences room 436 ("The Cave")] [Bioethics Club: Mondays from 5:30pm-6:30pm in Leigh Hall 408] Can you think of a situation where it would be wrong to tell the truth?   Deontology: Ethics of duty/obligation/rules/principles Consequentialism: Actions are made right/wrong entirely by consequences Opponents of consequentialism generally think that some action-types are subject to restrictions. Restrictions (forbidden) Requirements (obligatory/duty) Options (ok to do but also ok not to do) Utilitarianism: An action is morally right if and only if performing the action produces at least as great an overall balance of utility over disutility for all affected as any alternative action that could be performed instead. Some actions are BETTER or WORSE than others. It seems that in some cases, requirements and restrictions can be overridden. Under what conditions? When the consequences become “heavy eno...

Notes for 4/17/2026

 4/17/2026 [Philosophy Club every Monday, 4-5 pm, in the Buchtel College of Arts and Sciences room 436 ("The Cave")] [Bioethics Club: Mondays from 5:30pm-6:30pm in Leigh Hall 408] Is it wrong to cheat on your partner even if no one ever finds out?   Subjectivism How might we avoid subjectivism? How could objectivism in ethics possibly be defended? Principle of reciprocity (rational consistency) This makes it possible to value the experiences of others. And the qualitative character of experiences (whether our own or others’) is a matter of FACT, not opinion. Utilitarianism: The right action is the one that produces the most overall pleasure for all affected among all available choices. Utilitarianism is an instance of CONSEQUENTIALISM = actions are made right or wrong entirely by their consequences. Deontology: Some actions that are wrong “on principle” independently of their consequences. (Ethics is broadly a matter of following certain rules of conduct.) Best known deontolo...

Notes for 4/15/2026

4/15/2026 [Philosophy Club every Monday, 4-5 pm, in the Buchtel College of Arts and Sciences room 436 ("The Cave")] [Bioethics Club: Mondays from 5:30pm-6:30pm in Leigh Hall 408] Is it ok to lie to protect someone’s feelings?   Plato: Knowledge, including ethical knowledge, is a function of reason. Perception/sensation belongs to the body. Reason belongs to the soul. Empiricism: David Hume   Ethical subjectivism is the view that the truth of ethical judgments is subjective. Arguments FOR ethical subjectivism: There are two main arguments for ethical subjectivism. The first derives from the question of how anyone could ever KNOW whether or not ethical judgments are true. Consider: “It was wrong for Eric to murder Bob.” How could anyone ever know this was true? David Hume approached this question from his empiricism. Do we perceive the wrongness of killing Bob through the senses? (No.) Is killing Bob wrong by definition? (No.) Then what is the basis of the judgment? Hume’s answ...